English
پارسی
The Fed held rates steady and kept its options open
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the FOMC left the federal funds target range unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%, arguing that the current stance of policy remains appropriate as the central bank continues balancing maximum employment and stable prices. In his opening remarks, Powell said the U.S. economy is still expanding at a solid pace, but inflation remains somewhat elevated, and the implications of the latest Middle East developments for the U.S. economy are still uncertain.
That combination defined the entire press conference. The Fed did not signal a preset path. Instead, Powell stressed that policymakers will judge any future adjustment by incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. In practical terms, that means the Committee is not committing to cuts, hikes, or a long hold in advance.
Powell’s opening statement: solid growth, weaker housing, and inflation still above target
Powell said available indicators still point to a U.S. economy expanding at a solid pace. Consumer spending has remained resilient, business fixed investment has continued to expand, and the Fed’s median projection sees real GDP growth at 2.4% in 2026 and 2.3% in 2027. He contrasted that with ongoing weakness in housing activity.
On the labor market, Powell said the unemployment rate was 4.4% in February and had changed little in recent months. Job gains have remained low, but he argued that part of the slowdown reflects weaker labor-force growth, including lower immigration and labor-force participation. The Fed’s median projection also shows unemployment at 4.4% at year-end.
Inflation, however, remains the problem that has not been fully solved. Powell said estimates imply 2.8% headline PCE inflation and 3.0% core PCE inflation over the 12 months through February. He added that goods-sector inflation has been lifted by tariff effects, while near-term inflation expectations have risen in recent weeks, likely reflecting higher oil prices linked to Middle East supply disruptions.
Why the oil shock matters more this time
One of the most important themes in the Q&A was Powell’s treatment of energy inflation. He acknowledged the usual central-bank instinct to look through oil shocks, but he made clear that this is not automatic in the current environment. He said any decision to look through higher energy prices depends on inflation expectations remaining anchored, and it must also be judged against the broader backdrop of inflation having run above target for about five years.
That matters because Powell did not describe the latest oil move as a simple temporary nuisance. He said higher energy prices will push up overall inflation in the near term, but the scale and duration of the broader economic effects are still unknown. He repeatedly returned to the same idea: policymakers do not yet know whether the shock will leave only a limited mark or create a more material drag on consumption and inflation dynamics.
Why the Fed still sees a path to cuts
Powell was asked why the Fed’s rate projections still show a mild bias toward cuts this year despite higher inflation projections. His answer was conditional rather than dovish. He said the median path did not change, but several participants shifted toward fewer cuts, and any easing path depends on actual progress in inflation. More specifically, Powell said policymakers expect tariff-related goods inflation to fade as those effects move through the system during the middle part of the year.
He was explicit about the condition attached to that view: if the expected progress on inflation does not appear, then the case for a rate cut weakens. That makes the Fed’s current easing bias far softer than a promise. It is better understood as a contingent scenario, not a baseline commitment.
The dominant Q&A message was uncertainty
If one word captured Powell’s Q&A, it was uncertainty. He said no one really knows how large or how persistent the economic effects of the Middle East shock will be. He acknowledged that a long period of much higher gasoline prices would weigh on disposable income and consumption, but he also said the pass-through could turn out to be smaller than expected. He even noted that this was the kind of SEP round in which some participants joked it would be better to skip projections entirely because the range of possible outcomes is so wide.
Powell also said that the U.S. economy has remained remarkably resilient through repeated shocks over the past few years, and he declined to speculate about how the next six weeks would reshape the outlook. His core point was that policymakers will know much more by the next meeting, but not enough is known now to pre-commit to a firm direction.
Oil, diesel, and supply-chain spillovers are now part of the inflation debate
Powell acknowledged that oil price increases can spread beyond gasoline. In one exchange, he said oil and its derivatives feed into the production and transportation of many goods, meaning the shock can hit headline inflation directly and also leak into core inflation. He said those effects may be smaller in core than in headline inflation, but they are real and material, and the Fed is watching them closely.
At the same time, he said the Fed cannot meaningfully control the external shock itself. When asked about other commodities, shipping disruptions, and supply-chain snarls, Powell said much of it is outside the Fed’s hands and will depend on how long the current situation lasts, how prices respond, and how consumers adjust.
Powell did not rule out another hike
One of the firmer headlines from the Q&A was Powell’s confirmation that the possibility of the Fed’s next move being an increase did come up at the meeting, just as it did at the previous one. He immediately added that the vast majority of participants do not see that as their base case, but he also stressed that the Fed does not take options off the table.
Later, when asked how high oil prices or inflation would have to go for the Fed to consider hiking, Powell declined to give a threshold. He said only that the Committee is prepared to do what needs to be done. That left the Fed’s reaction function clearly open in both directions.
Labor-market downside risk remains part of the equation
Powell did not present the labor market as a clean source of comfort. He argued that the unemployment rate has been stable and may currently matter more than payroll growth because both labor demand and labor supply have slowed sharply. Still, he acknowledged that the labor market carries downside risk and said the Fed is watching that carefully.
He described policy as sitting near the high end of neutral or modestly restrictive, which he said is appropriate in a setting where risks to inflation are on the upside while risks to the labor market are on the downside. That balancing act was one of the clearest explanations Powell offered for why the Fed is neither rushing to cut nor eager to tighten further.
Affordability, Fed independence, and succession also came up
Powell said Americans still feel squeezed even after several years of positive real wage gains. He pointed to ongoing price pressure in areas such as insurance and said those lived affordability pressures make the Fed even more committed to returning inflation to 2% on a sustained basis.
He also defended Fed independence, saying independence is what allows the central bank to preserve price stability and do its job credibly. On leadership, Powell said that if his successor is not confirmed by the end of his term as chair, he would serve as chair pro tem until confirmation, as required by law. He also said he has no intention of leaving the Board until the investigation referenced in the Fed’s legal brief is fully resolved.
Powell’s AI comments were more cautious than bullish
In the final part of the press conference, Powell said the increase in longer-run growth assumptions reflects stronger productivity rather than a clear visible effect from generative AI so far. He said the Fed has not really started to see AI’s effects in the data yet.
He also pushed back against the idea that AI is automatically a near-term disinflation force. Powell said the current AI buildout is driving data-center construction, which is putting pressure on a range of goods and services and may be lifting inflation at the margin while also pushing up the neutral rate. Over time, higher productivity could support disinflation, but he said that remains an empirical question rather than something policymakers can assume in advance.
FAQ
1) What did Powell announce in the March 2026 press conference?
Powell said the Fed left the federal funds target range unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75% and remains focused on balancing maximum employment with stable prices.
2) Why did the Fed hold rates steady?
Powell said the current stance of policy is appropriate while the Fed assesses incoming data, the evolving outlook, and risks from inflation, labor markets, tariffs, and the Middle East shock.
3) What did Powell say about oil prices and inflation?
He said higher energy prices will lift overall inflation in the near term, but the size and duration of the economic impact remain uncertain. He also said oil and related inputs can spill into core inflation through production and transportation channels.
4) Did Powell say rate cuts are still possible in 2026?
Yes, but only conditionally. Powell said the projected path toward cuts depends on actual progress in inflation, especially as tariff-related goods inflation fades.
5) Did Powell rule out another rate hike?
No. Powell said the possibility that the next move could be an increase was discussed, though he also said that is not the base case for the vast majority of participants.
6) What did Powell say about the labor market?
He said the unemployment rate has remained stable, but job gains have been low, and labor-market downside risk still matters. The Fed is watching that side of the mandate carefully.
7) What is Powell’s current inflation message?
Inflation has come down from earlier highs, but it is still above target. Powell said core PCE inflation is around 3.0%, headline PCE inflation is around 2.8%, and progress on some inflation categories has been slower than hoped.
8) What did Powell say about affordability?
He said households still feel squeezed despite positive real wage gains, and that lived inflation pressure reinforces the Fed’s commitment to returning inflation to 2% on a sustained basis.
9) What did Powell say about Fed independence?
Powell said central-bank independence is essential because it allows the Fed to preserve price stability and carry out its dual mandate credibly.
10) What did Powell say about AI and productivity?
He said stronger, longer-run growth assumptions reflect productivity gains more than visible generative AI effects so far, and he cautioned that AI investment may raise inflation in the near term through data-center construction.
Comments