Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, told Al Arabiya that Iran “will know when the time comes,” when asked about the possibility of new strikes on Iran amid reports of expanded U.S. naval deployments to the region—an intentionally ambiguous message that keeps deterrence pressure high while withholding operational specifics.
Market impact: Supports a higher geopolitical risk premium—typically bullish for crude risk hedges and safe havens (oil volatility, gold, USD), and negative for regional risk assets if escalation odds rise.
Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer said Stockholm strongly condemns the deadly use of force against protesters and mass arrests in Iran and stands with the Iranian people. She said Sweden is working actively within the EU to increase pressure on the Islamic Republic and to secure new sanctions targeting officials responsible for the crackdown, to adopt them by the next EU foreign ministers’ meeting. Malmer added Sweden has long pushed to list the IRGC as an EU terrorist organization—a position backed by Sweden’s parliament—while noting Iran’s ambassador has previously been summoned, the human-rights situation (especially for women and minorities) remains “deeply concerning,” and Sweden is pursuing protection for individuals on Swedish soil who face threats or harassment linked to Tehran. She also said non-binding agreements signed between Iran and Sweden in 2017 are effectively halted, and there are no plans to expand economic ties.
Russia signaled it will not accept a long-term Ukraine settlement without a territorial agreement, and said it will continue military operations until a deal is reached. The stance was reiterated after late-night talks in Moscow with U.S. envoys tied to President Trump’s push to open a new negotiating track, with the Kremlin framing territory as the key unresolved obstacle heading into planned follow-on talks.
Market impact: Reduces odds of a quick ceasefire, keeping Europe geopolitical risk premia elevated—supportive for energy-war risk premium and defense-linked names, while adding two-way headline volatility for EUR and European rates.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace initiative continued to draw attention at Davos as critics argued it could undermine the role of the United Nations. Trump described the effort as historic and fundamental to resolving conflicts like Gaza, while some international figures cautioned that the board’s structure might rival established multilateral institutions.
Market impact: Ongoing debates may sustain uncertainty in risk valuations for markets tied to geopolitical stability and international governance frameworks.
President Donald Trump formally launched his “Board of Peace” initiative at a charter‑signing ceremony in Davos, aimed at mediating global conflicts such as the Gaza war. Despite Trump’s framing of the body as a future rival to longstanding institutions, participation from key U.S. allies remains limited, with several countries opting not to sign on.
Market impact: Continued geopolitical uncertainty around new peace frameworks can affect asset valuations in markets tied to conflict regions and international diplomacy.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called on European leaders to take stronger action against Russia following a reportedly positive meeting with former U.S. President Trump at Davos. Zelensky emphasized the need for Europe to provide more decisive support, particularly in defense, amid the ongoing conflict and winter hardships in Ukraine.
Market impact: Ongoing conflict risk and calls for expanded support may influence defense sector equities and European market risk pricing.
The first trilateral U.S.–Russia–Ukraine security meeting is set for January 23 in Abu Dhabi, marking a new phase in the Trump-led push to structure “security working groups” around a possible settlement framework. Russia’s delegation will be led by GRU chief Igor Kostyukov, according to Moscow. Officials also said U.S. envoys briefed President Vladimir Putin on Trump’s meeting with President Volodymyr Zelensky in Davos, as talks shift from leader-level contacts toward technical negotiating tracks.
Market impact: Headline-driven risk-on/risk-off catalyst—credible progress can compress geopolitical risk premia (supporting European risk assets and weighing on energy-war risk premium), while any stalemate/escalation could quickly reprice oil, European FX, and defense-linked names.
A new strategic read of Vladimir Putin’s reported offer to contribute $1 billion to Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” argues Moscow is trying to convert its frozen assets into a diplomatic instrument while positioning itself for a potentially consequential partnership with the White House. The logic is twofold: first, any $1B transfer would likely require specific U.S. legal steps to unfreeze at least part of Russia’s blocked funds—creating a precedent that could open pathways for other assets, while allowing Putin to frame the freeze as a “previous administration” decision and shift the burden to Trump to prove a policy break. Second, Moscow casts the initiative as a broad global-stability platform—welcoming participation but stressing consultations with strategic partners—while using the pledge to reinforce its Middle East posture: insisting any process must align with UN decisions, fully account for Palestinian rights and needs, and prioritize Gaza reconstruction (health systems, water networks, and uninterrupted food supply).
U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters that a “large fleet” of American military equipment and forces is moving toward Iran, adding that he would prefer “nothing happens” but said the situation is being monitored closely. Trump also claimed he warned Tehran that if a plan to execute 837 people went ahead, Iran would be “hit harder than ever,” and said the executions were called off about an hour before the scheduled time—calling that a “positive sign.” Asked whether he wants Iran’s Supreme Leader to resign or go into exile, Trump said he does not see that “at this time” and declined to engage in the discussion.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in his Jan. 22 speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos that the Iranian protests were “drowned in blood” and argued the world did not support Iranians enough, noting that while Europe was in the Christmas–New Year holiday period, “the Ayatollah had already killed thousands” by the time politicians returned and formed positions. He warned that if Iran’s ruling system survives, it sends a dangerous lesson to other authoritarian leaders—“kill enough people, and you stay in power”—and questioned what Iran could become after such bloodshed.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday, on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, that Iran is seeking talks with Washington and that the United States is prepared to negotiate, delivering the remarks during the launch event for his “Board of Peace” initiative. Trump also referenced U.S. military strikes on Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities last year, framing them as intended to prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and reiterated that “we’ll talk.” Iranian officials had not issued an official response at the time of the reports.
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado said on Thursday, January 22, 2026 (2 Bahman) that she met with Prince Reza Pahlavi, writing on X that they exchanged views on their respective struggles and coordinated efforts around a shared objective: freeing Iran and Venezuela from tyranny. She said she conveyed “deep admiration” for Iranians who continue fighting for their future despite what she described as brutal repression, arguing that as authoritarian regimes deepen “criminal cooperation,” pro-freedom forces must strengthen coordination. Machado warned that the Caracas–Tehran partnership has turned Venezuela into a hub for the Islamic Republic’s influence and has endangered the security of the entire Western Hemisphere. She added that the survival of such regimes is not only a tragedy for citizens seeking democracy but also a direct threat to global stability and the United States, alleging that Iran uses Venezuela as a key platform to fuel instability, terrorism, and transnational criminal networks beyond its borders. She concluded that a free Iran and a free Venezuela are not just aspirations but necessary conditions for a safer, democratic world, and insisted both countries will be free.